Can the Subaltern Speak? – Summary and Analysis

Introduction:

"Can the Subaltern Speak?" is a groundbreaking essay by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, first published in 1988. It is one of the most influential works in postcolonial studies, feminist theory, and Marxist criticism. In this essay, Spivak critiques Western intellectuals and examines whether the "subaltern"—the most marginalized and oppressed groups in society—can have a voice in historical and political discourse.

Key Themes and Arguments:

1. Critique of Western Intellectuals:

Spivak criticizes Western theorists, particularly Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze, for assuming that marginalized people can easily represent themselves. She argues that these intellectuals, while discussing power and oppression, often ignore the voices of the oppressed themselves. Instead of truly understanding subaltern experiences, they impose their own interpretations.

2. Concept of the Subaltern:

The term subaltern comes from Antonio Gramsci, referring to socially and politically marginalized groups. Spivak extends this idea, focusing on colonial subjects, poor rural women, and the lowest castes in India. These people are not just oppressed but are also excluded from the dominant discourse.

3. Representation vs. Representation:

Spivak differentiates between two meanings of "representation":

• Political Representation (Vertreten): Speaking on behalf of someone.

• Symbolic Representation (Darstellen): Portraying someone’s identity or experience.

She argues that when intellectuals claim to "represent" the subaltern, they actually replace their voices rather than allowing them to speak for themselves.

4. Sati and the Silencing of Women:

Spivak uses the practice of Sati (the ritual burning of widows in colonial India) as an example of how subaltern women are denied a voice.

• The British colonialists banned Sati, claiming to "save" Indian women, presenting themselves as their protectors.

• The Hindu nationalists defended Sati, arguing that it was a part of Indian tradition and culture.

In both cases, the actual women involved in Sati had no voice in the debate about their own lives. Their perspectives were erased, showing how subaltern women remain unheard.

5. "The Subaltern Cannot Speak":

Spivak concludes that the subaltern cannot speak because their voices are either ignored, distorted, or overshadowed by dominant power structures. Even when they try to express themselves, they are often misinterpreted or silenced.

Significance and Impact:

"Can the Subaltern Speak?" remains a foundational text in postcolonial theory and feminist criticism. It challenges scholars to rethink how they study marginalized communities and emphasizes the need to create spaces where the subaltern can genuinely express themselves.

Conclusion

Spivak’s essay is a powerful critique of Western intellectual traditions and a call to recognize the invisibility of subaltern voices. She urges scholars, activists, and historians to avoid speaking for the subaltern and instead listen to their experiences in their own terms.

WhatsApp Group Join Now

Telegram Group Join Now